-
Nick Harrington



- Joined on 07-14-2004
- Kenilworth, United Kingdom
- Posts 2,349
- Points 34,984
|
EMR/u News for October 2007
This is a summary of the hot-topics discussed here at emrupdate.com during October 2007.
[YouTube:px6cGpnIfaM]
- We sent Robert Gleeman on a mission of
investigative reporting regarding the story http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/t/10797.aspx
Sermo.com's $26.7M Prescription Dr. Alberto Borges joined Sermo.com, and he reported back to us why
a forum would need 30 million dollars. He not only signed up and reported
back, he's already collected a share of the 30 million! He's
already collected $60 dollars for his medical posts, and if he gets 15
people to sign up with Sermo.com, he gets $200.00! Al, thanks for the
great investigative report. Sermo caught our interest because it is a community, like
EMR Update, where doctors share ideas.
- Always a popular and heated
topic, CCHIT, the self-proclaimed EMR regulatory agency, has not let us
down in this popular thread, http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/t/11005.aspx
Since C-CHIT seems to be a hot topic... The article cited
states the opinion that not should a doctor ONLY purchase an EMR that is
CCHIT certified, but also, that it should be certified for the year 2007.
That criteria includes only eight EMR software products at this time, and
the question is asked, "What are you trying to do, create an EMR shortage?
Needless to say, the discussion is a hot cauldron of streaming emotion to
some, no big deal to others. It appears that if this decline represents
the downward trend in regard for CCHIT by vendors themselves, we might
actually see the organization die of "malnutrition". 566 reads, 24
replies.
-
Is your EMR Granular?
http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/t/10996.aspx
is a continuation of an ongoing multi-year discussion on
"granularity", it seems mostly between Dr. Quit and Dr. Matt Chase.
Gleeman may think that granularity is something you get from making love
on the beach, but actually, it relates to the fineness, or resolution of
recorded data. Granular data can be found in the database and cited on a
report, where a simple field of text cannot. If you need granularity, you
better get it in the beginning. With 977 reads and 44 replies, this is
obviously one hot issue, and one which many people find difficult to
discuss objectively. The question comes up: Does granularity require more
time, slowing down the system? Perhaps we need to have a race?
-
Vendors:
did CCHIT Hurt or Help Your Sales?
http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/t/10959.aspx another thread about CCHIT,
seems to have brought out a sense of vendor bravado: no vendor appears to
blame CCHIT for hurting their sales. Is this just bravado, or is CCHIT
really being ignored by doctors buying EMR? The question in this thread is
directed at vendors, and those vendor who did not certify claim it did not
hurt their sales, while those who did certify cannot really prove it
helped their sales. But the point was made that vendors better get used to
some type of certification, because the market will not support 300
uncertified vendors. 616 people read the posts, with 27 replies so far.
-
MCMP (Medicare P4P) Update
http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/t/10889.aspx
started out as a very "doctorly"
discussion on the latest requirements for "Pay for Performance" within the
Medicare system, and soon evolved into a discussion of granularity, where
our chief guru of all things granular, Dr. Matt Chase, posted some
beautiful screenshots of Medtuity EMR, his company's product, which
prompted the aforementioned thread Is your EMR Granular? This is
because a doctor may very well need a high degree of granularity to make
P4P work for them. This shows how all the threads are really
inter-connected. So far, this pivotal thread has garnered 798 reads and 33
replies. We will probably see this thread revived many times over the
years.
- Speaking
of thread revivals, Are you presently using an EMR in your
practice? http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/t/1864.aspx
is an old thread that was started back in Oct. of 2004! A few
new members added their experiences, bringing up the point that no one can
ever be certain of getting the last word in a forum, unless the topic has
been locked. Some threads seem almost to be eternal. In fact, when I was
new to EMR Update, I used to reply to old threads without really noticing
the last post date. There is nothing wrong with that! As long as the
thread is not locked, and most are not, you can always revive it. It just
depends on your attention span, and for doctors, that seems to be years!
This thread is a true "classic" with 3,397 reads and 31 replies, a "who's
who" of the glorious past of our forum!
- Certainly one of most recurring subjects, Is
hosted solution the way to go for the small practice? http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/t/10814.aspx
once again covers the eternal question of which way is best for using an
EMR system, to connect to the software through the Internet in what we
call an ASP, application service provider, or the alternative, to run an
in-office server. Perhaps a bit on the technical side, this discussion is
essential for every doctor looking into purchasing -or renting-EMR
software. It is the single biggest decision in EMR, to host or not to
host, that is the question. Do you really want to take care of a server?
If you are going to keep it on the floor and slosh it with cleaning fluid,
you probably shouldn't. If you want to control your software and data with
an iron fist, you probably should. This post has so far generated 973
reads with 31 replies, and we are bound to discuss this topic until the
end of time.
-
Do Surgical
Specialties Really Need An EMR?
http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/t/10631.aspx
Another great topic from DrQuit, this thread covers the question
of whether or not a surgeon needs an EMR, and to make a long story short,
the answer appears to be a resounding YES. From medication information to
wrong-site-surgery, surgeons say they have the same basic needs as all
doctors, but I think there is a "next step" to this thread, which is, what
are the best EMRs for surgeons and why? Even though a relatively new
question in the forum, this thread has a solid readership of 1,014 reads
and 29 replies, so I think we will be hearing more from and about
surgeons' use of EMR.
- And of
course, we have to mention at least one "super-thread" and I think this
one certainly qualifies: e-MDs Next Generation of Software http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/t/7172.aspx
which is exactly what is says it is, an advanced discussion of an
advanced EMR product concept, something that will be a major departure from
every product that has come before it. In fact, it is not planned at this
time to apply for CCHIT certification on this one! What more can we say:
with 59,761 reads and 282 replies, this has to be one of the most popular
threads of this or any other forum! The new product is expected to come
out in Jan. of 2008, so it won't be long now!
-
Channeling
NextGen accolades
http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/t/10852.aspx
is perhaps the rarest type of post we have seen, in that one vendor
reports client compliments received on a competitive vendor's product. You
don't see that happening very often, but it helps the industry to show
that we are all on the same side. Like I said, this kind of gentlemanly behavior
is not only rare, but also probably hard for many people to believe, as
evidenced by this thread only getting 306 reads and 4 replies, but
sometimes, you just have to go with quality over quantity!
Thanks for catching up on all of the latest emrupdate.com news. At the end of this presentation I provide some Top Tips for navigating around emrupdate.com highlighting the following tips: 
- Sections! -- Yes we do have different forum sections.
- Your Topics -- posts that you have authored across all forums, or a specific forum, by a selected date range.
- Hot and Active topics -- all Active Posts across all forums, or a specific forum, by a selected date range.
- Popular Tags -- tags can be added when you post a new post. If enough same-Tags exist they're displayed in Popular Tags for that active forum section.
- YouTube -- how to add (Safe for Work) YouTube content
- Wikipedia -- how to add wikipedia callouts for terms and phrases within your post.
- Site Wide Navigation Footer -- Checkout the footer for quick section navigation.
Nick
Nick Harrington email me or Skype: nickharrington emrupdate.com If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants" Sir Isaac Newton 1676
|
|