Well, sometimes it seems like every user wants something different! 
Some people think the change to SQL is going to make a big difference.
Obviously, a lot of users would like an integrated PM system. However, a lot of our present users have already found workarounds that they are happy with, and just want their workarounds to work better!
Likewise, a lot of folks would like to see an integrated Chronic Health Registry. Others feel that such stuff is mumbo-jumbo and don't want the program cluttered and bloated with inessentials.
I think the typical Amazing Charts users' practice models are based on having a quick, inexpensive, intuitive EMR, and they would like to have a lot of these features, but at the same time don't want to louse up a good thing. I think the idea that every EMR needs every feature is misguided. After all, are any two practices exactly alike?
I know that Jon is working on all of these projects presently, as well as a number of other keen improvements. I credit a lot of Jon's success to his very simple, direct approach to these kinds of problems in the past.
Brian Cotner, M.D. - Family Practitioner First Amazing Charts Users' Conference Branson, Missouri - June 20-22, 2008