<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.emrupdate.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.emrupdate.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Brendon's Comments</title><link>http://www.emrupdate.com/members/Brendon/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>Recommended Scanner</title><link>http://www.emrupdate.com/members/Brendon/comments/default.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:17:43 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>BenjaminSerrato</dc:creator><description>Brendon,

I saw that you recommended a certain scanner as best a few weeks ago.  You also strongly recommended against the ScanSnap.  I have used the ScanSnap and it is very user friendly.  I understand the lack of TWAIN support makes it non-ideal for a physicains office.  So, we chose the Canon DR-2010c.  What is your opinion on this scanner? </description></item></channel></rss>