<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.emrupdate.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.emrupdate.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Osler's Comments</title><link>http://www.emrupdate.com/members/Osler/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>I read your comment</title><link>http://www.emrupdate.com/members/Osler/comments/default.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:07:48 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Eric Lessard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I read your post &amp;quot;How to get rich quick.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; I agree with your explanation of why it is impossible for a doctor, who has a practice to run, to fully investigate the dozens of EMR vendors out there before making a decision.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I see this as an opportunity for me.&amp;nbsp; I can spend the time necessary to research the products, then share my knowledge with many doctors.&amp;nbsp; It will be more efficient for many doctors to benefit from my effort, than to force each doctor to research this complex (and deception-filled) industry on their own.&amp;nbsp; I intend to sell and service EMR software, and I hope that my approach helps me find success.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am in the research phase right now, looking for an EMR that I can believe in and recommend in good faith.&amp;nbsp; I am intrigued by Praxis, as they seem to have a unique approach.&amp;nbsp; Would you be able to give me any feedback or comment about this product?&amp;nbsp; If not, do you know anyone who currently uses it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank your for your time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eric Lessard&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>e-MDs Web EMR</title><link>http://www.emrupdate.com/members/Osler/comments/default.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 03:21:17 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>JoeSoftware</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Some history on the project:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the summer of 2007 e-MDs
started looking at moving their entire platform to C#/.Net using WPF.&amp;nbsp;
At that time they did have some web projects, but not the EMR Web Chart
thingy from what I understand.&amp;nbsp; They actually contracted a firm to do
extensive designs for this new *desktop* based system.&amp;nbsp; I was told by
someone at that company that e-MDs spent nearly $2 million on design
with them.&amp;nbsp; It is my understanding they had also hired on some
non-Delphi programmers - .Net and ASP.Net people to work on this and
other new projects.&amp;nbsp; At the same time some new management was pushing
for a web based solution.&amp;nbsp; The owner (Dr. Winn) was having health
issues and really wasn&amp;#39;t running the company so various VPs and the
like were pulling priorities and projects in several, often
conflicting, directions. I am not sure when the new president came in,
Dr. Stearns, but it was during this time.&amp;nbsp; And I am not sure how clear
his authority has ever really been.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The web based charting project was started perhaps in the fall
of 2007?&amp;nbsp; I don&amp;#39;t have all the dates.&amp;nbsp; It was to be built on top of
some of the work they were doing for their .Net desktop effort.&amp;nbsp; They
planned on utilizing some of the same data base changes, the same C#
logic they were writing for their desktop migration.&amp;nbsp; In early 2008
e-MDs laid off a number of programmers.&amp;nbsp; It is my understanding they
basically laid off all the most expensive programmers they could to
deal with the economic climate.&amp;nbsp; This seems like it was the .Net
people.&amp;nbsp; I say this because I think they kept many of their old hands
that had worked there for years and were probably experts in the old
desktop Delphi stuff.&amp;nbsp; I could be wrong - perhaps some of these people
were laid off as well.&amp;nbsp; If you think about this it makes sense if they
needed to stop the bleeding yet still support the product in the field
that is actually making money.&amp;nbsp; There were also sweeping layoffs
throughout other departments.&amp;nbsp; I think the developer layoffs were
first, but this is just from what I know.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In any case, they
basically got rid of all of the developers that were familiar with the
web EMR Web project and the software upon which it was being built.&amp;nbsp; At
the time this occurred (spring 2008) I believed they were gearing up
for summer beta trials, and planned to have the product released in the
fall.&amp;nbsp; This was behind schedule already from what I understood.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After
the layoffs they brought in a new development manager firing their
long-time CTO, and he brought in a couple of people he knew to do the
development.&amp;nbsp; At this point I am not sure exactly what happened,
because a lot of people at e-MDs with which I was familiar had either
been laid off or left on their own accord during/after all the
layoffs.&amp;nbsp; So it has been a bit of a mess up at e-MDs business-wise.&amp;nbsp; A
contact told me that today was the last day for the *new* guy they
brought in to get the new web EMR and other project done, and none of
those things are actually done.&amp;nbsp; It sounds like there has been a lot of
brain-drain at the company with many of the software developers that
knew the software having left, and the rest are demoralized or are
contractors just maintaining the project.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would not expect a
web EMR charting solution from e-MDs anytime soon though I did learn
today they are actually still working on it.&amp;nbsp; Its really too bad, because if they had just chosen a path
and committed, and made a commitment to a lot of talented people that
have now left, they would probably have a great product on the market.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>