<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.emrupdate.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tag 'exercise'</title><link>http://www.emrupdate.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?s=10&amp;o=DateDescending&amp;tag=exercise&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tag 'exercise'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Debug Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: Do you assess your patient's aerobic exercise level ?  How ?</title><link>http://www.emrupdate.com/forums/p/7228/56413.aspx#56413</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 18:16:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">20e05eeb-3865-4fb3-88f6-9927a35687dd:56413</guid><dc:creator>DrMurdoch</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I suppose I support the idea that more vigorous exercise is better than less vigorous exercise.&amp;nbsp; I suppose METS is one way to judge how vigorous the activity in question is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;METS Activity&amp;nbsp;of various pursuits&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bicycling: leisure 4 &lt;br /&gt;Golf: general 4.5 &lt;br /&gt;Golf: carrying clubs 5.5 &lt;br /&gt;Golf: pulling clubs 5 &lt;br /&gt;Golf: using power cart 3.5 &lt;br /&gt;Tennis: general 7 &lt;br /&gt;Tennis: doubles 6 &lt;br /&gt;Tennis: singles 8 &lt;br /&gt;Stationary bicycling: light 5.5 &lt;br /&gt;Walking: &amp;lt;2.0 mph-very slow 2 &lt;br /&gt;Stationary bicycling: moderate 7 &lt;br /&gt;Walking: 2.5 mph 3 &lt;br /&gt;Walking: 3.0 mph-moderate 3.5 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;To calculate the calories burned based on the METS, use this formula: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Weight (in kg, kg = lbs/2.2) * METS = Calories Burned per hour &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This does not take into account differences in metabolism due to gender, age, or body composition which may cause results to vary. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I guess I am looking at a standardized tool (or something :)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ) to assess their activity level.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>